gittutorial(7)


NAME

   gittutorial - A tutorial introduction to Git

SYNOPSIS

   git *

DESCRIPTION

   This tutorial explains how to import a new project into Git, make
   changes to it, and share changes with other developers.

   If you are instead primarily interested in using Git to fetch a
   project, for example, to test the latest version, you may prefer to
   start with the first two chapters of The Git User's Manual[1].

   First, note that you can get documentation for a command such as git
   log --graph with:

       $ man git-log

   or:

       $ git help log

   With the latter, you can use the manual viewer of your choice; see git-
   help(1) for more information.

   It is a good idea to introduce yourself to Git with your name and
   public email address before doing any operation. The easiest way to do
   so is:

       $ git config --global user.name "Your Name Comes Here"
       $ git config --global user.email you@yourdomain.example.com

IMPORTING A NEW PROJECT

   Assume you have a tarball project.tar.gz with your initial work. You
   can place it under Git revision control as follows.

       $ tar xzf project.tar.gz
       $ cd project
       $ git init

   Git will reply

       Initialized empty Git repository in .git/

   You've now initialized the working directory---you may notice a new
   directory created, named ".git".

   Next, tell Git to take a snapshot of the contents of all files under
   the current directory (note the .), with git add:

       $ git add .

   This snapshot is now stored in a temporary staging area which Git calls
   the "index". You can permanently store the contents of the index in the
   repository with git commit:

       $ git commit

   This will prompt you for a commit message. You've now stored the first
   version of your project in Git.

MAKING CHANGES

   Modify some files, then add their updated contents to the index:

       $ git add file1 file2 file3

   You are now ready to commit. You can see what is about to be committed
   using git diff with the --cached option:

       $ git diff --cached

   (Without --cached, git diff will show you any changes that you've made
   but not yet added to the index.) You can also get a brief summary of
   the situation with git status:

       $ git status
       On branch master
       Changes to be committed:
       Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
         (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)

               modified:   file1
               modified:   file2
               modified:   file3

   If you need to make any further adjustments, do so now, and then add
   any newly modified content to the index. Finally, commit your changes
   with:

       $ git commit

   This will again prompt you for a message describing the change, and
   then record a new version of the project.

   Alternatively, instead of running git add beforehand, you can use

       $ git commit -a

   which will automatically notice any modified (but not new) files, add
   them to the index, and commit, all in one step.

   A note on commit messages: Though not required, it's a good idea to
   begin the commit message with a single short (less than 50 character)
   line summarizing the change, followed by a blank line and then a more
   thorough description. The text up to the first blank line in a commit
   message is treated as the commit title, and that title is used
   throughout Git. For example, git-format-patch(1) turns a commit into
   email, and it uses the title on the Subject line and the rest of the
   commit in the body.

GIT TRACKS CONTENT NOT FILES

   Many revision control systems provide an add command that tells the
   system to start tracking changes to a new file. Git's add command does
   something simpler and more powerful: git add is used both for new and
   newly modified files, and in both cases it takes a snapshot of the
   given files and stages that content in the index, ready for inclusion
   in the next commit.

VIEWING PROJECT HISTORY

   At any point you can view the history of your changes using

       $ git log

   If you also want to see complete diffs at each step, use

       $ git log -p

   Often the overview of the change is useful to get a feel of each step

       $ git log --stat --summary

MANAGING BRANCHES

   A single Git repository can maintain multiple branches of development.
   To create a new branch named "experimental", use

       $ git branch experimental

   If you now run

       $ git branch

   you'll get a list of all existing branches:

         experimental
       * master

   The "experimental" branch is the one you just created, and the "master"
   branch is a default branch that was created for you automatically. The
   asterisk marks the branch you are currently on; type

       $ git checkout experimental

   to switch to the experimental branch. Now edit a file, commit the
   change, and switch back to the master branch:

       (edit file)
       $ git commit -a
       $ git checkout master

   Check that the change you made is no longer visible, since it was made
   on the experimental branch and you're back on the master branch.

   You can make a different change on the master branch:

       (edit file)
       $ git commit -a

   at this point the two branches have diverged, with different changes
   made in each. To merge the changes made in experimental into master,
   run

       $ git merge experimental

   If the changes don't conflict, you're done. If there are conflicts,
   markers will be left in the problematic files showing the conflict;

       $ git diff

   will show this. Once you've edited the files to resolve the conflicts,

       $ git commit -a

   will commit the result of the merge. Finally,

       $ gitk

   will show a nice graphical representation of the resulting history.

   At this point you could delete the experimental branch with

       $ git branch -d experimental

   This command ensures that the changes in the experimental branch are
   already in the current branch.

   If you develop on a branch crazy-idea, then regret it, you can always
   delete the branch with

       $ git branch -D crazy-idea

   Branches are cheap and easy, so this is a good way to try something
   out.

USING GIT FOR COLLABORATION

   Suppose that Alice has started a new project with a Git repository in
   /home/alice/project, and that Bob, who has a home directory on the same
   machine, wants to contribute.

   Bob begins with:

       bob$ git clone /home/alice/project myrepo

   This creates a new directory "myrepo" containing a clone of Alice's
   repository. The clone is on an equal footing with the original project,
   possessing its own copy of the original project's history.

   Bob then makes some changes and commits them:

       (edit files)
       bob$ git commit -a
       (repeat as necessary)

   When he's ready, he tells Alice to pull changes from the repository at
   /home/bob/myrepo. She does this with:

       alice$ cd /home/alice/project
       alice$ git pull /home/bob/myrepo master

   This merges the changes from Bob's "master" branch into Alice's current
   branch. If Alice has made her own changes in the meantime, then she may
   need to manually fix any conflicts.

   The "pull" command thus performs two operations: it fetches changes
   from a remote branch, then merges them into the current branch.

   Note that in general, Alice would want her local changes committed
   before initiating this "pull". If Bob's work conflicts with what Alice
   did since their histories forked, Alice will use her working tree and
   the index to resolve conflicts, and existing local changes will
   interfere with the conflict resolution process (Git will still perform
   the fetch but will refuse to merge --- Alice will have to get rid of
   her local changes in some way and pull again when this happens).

   Alice can peek at what Bob did without merging first, using the "fetch"
   command; this allows Alice to inspect what Bob did, using a special
   symbol "FETCH_HEAD", in order to determine if he has anything worth
   pulling, like this:

       alice$ git fetch /home/bob/myrepo master
       alice$ git log -p HEAD..FETCH_HEAD

   This operation is safe even if Alice has uncommitted local changes. The
   range notation "HEAD..FETCH_HEAD" means "show everything that is
   reachable from the FETCH_HEAD but exclude anything that is reachable
   from HEAD". Alice already knows everything that leads to her current
   state (HEAD), and reviews what Bob has in his state (FETCH_HEAD) that
   she has not seen with this command.

   If Alice wants to visualize what Bob did since their histories forked
   she can issue the following command:

       $ gitk HEAD..FETCH_HEAD

   This uses the same two-dot range notation we saw earlier with git log.

   Alice may want to view what both of them did since they forked. She can
   use three-dot form instead of the two-dot form:

       $ gitk HEAD...FETCH_HEAD

   This means "show everything that is reachable from either one, but
   exclude anything that is reachable from both of them".

   Please note that these range notation can be used with both gitk and
   "git log".

   After inspecting what Bob did, if there is nothing urgent, Alice may
   decide to continue working without pulling from Bob. If Bob's history
   does have something Alice would immediately need, Alice may choose to
   stash her work-in-progress first, do a "pull", and then finally unstash
   her work-in-progress on top of the resulting history.

   When you are working in a small closely knit group, it is not unusual
   to interact with the same repository over and over again. By defining
   remote repository shorthand, you can make it easier:

       alice$ git remote add bob /home/bob/myrepo

   With this, Alice can perform the first part of the "pull" operation
   alone using the git fetch command without merging them with her own
   branch, using:

       alice$ git fetch bob

   Unlike the longhand form, when Alice fetches from Bob using a remote
   repository shorthand set up with git remote, what was fetched is stored
   in a remote-tracking branch, in this case bob/master. So after this:

       alice$ git log -p master..bob/master

   shows a list of all the changes that Bob made since he branched from
   Alice's master branch.

   After examining those changes, Alice could merge the changes into her
   master branch:

       alice$ git merge bob/master

   This merge can also be done by pulling from her own remote-tracking
   branch, like this:

       alice$ git pull . remotes/bob/master

   Note that git pull always merges into the current branch, regardless of
   what else is given on the command line.

   Later, Bob can update his repo with Alice's latest changes using

       bob$ git pull

   Note that he doesn't need to give the path to Alice's repository; when
   Bob cloned Alice's repository, Git stored the location of her
   repository in the repository configuration, and that location is used
   for pulls:

       bob$ git config --get remote.origin.url
       /home/alice/project

   (The complete configuration created by git clone is visible using git
   config -l, and the git-config(1) man page explains the meaning of each
   option.)

   Git also keeps a pristine copy of Alice's master branch under the name
   "origin/master":

       bob$ git branch -r
         origin/master

   If Bob later decides to work from a different host, he can still
   perform clones and pulls using the ssh protocol:

       bob$ git clone alice.org:/home/alice/project myrepo

   Alternatively, Git has a native protocol, or can use http; see git-
   pull(1) for details.

   Git can also be used in a CVS-like mode, with a central repository that
   various users push changes to; see git-push(1) and gitcvs-migration(7).

EXPLORING HISTORY

   Git history is represented as a series of interrelated commits. We have
   already seen that the git log command can list those commits. Note that
   first line of each git log entry also gives a name for the commit:

       $ git log
       commit c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7
       Author: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
       Date:   Tue May 16 17:18:22 2006 -0700

           merge-base: Clarify the comments on post processing.

   We can give this name to git show to see the details about this commit.

       $ git show c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7

   But there are other ways to refer to commits. You can use any initial
   part of the name that is long enough to uniquely identify the commit:

       $ git show c82a22c39c   # the first few characters of the name are
                               # usually enough
       $ git show HEAD         # the tip of the current branch
       $ git show experimental # the tip of the "experimental" branch

   Every commit usually has one "parent" commit which points to the
   previous state of the project:

       $ git show HEAD^  # to see the parent of HEAD
       $ git show HEAD^^ # to see the grandparent of HEAD
       $ git show HEAD~4 # to see the great-great grandparent of HEAD

   Note that merge commits may have more than one parent:

       $ git show HEAD^1 # show the first parent of HEAD (same as HEAD^)
       $ git show HEAD^2 # show the second parent of HEAD

   You can also give commits names of your own; after running

       $ git tag v2.5 1b2e1d63ff

   you can refer to 1b2e1d63ff by the name "v2.5". If you intend to share
   this name with other people (for example, to identify a release
   version), you should create a "tag" object, and perhaps sign it; see
   git-tag(1) for details.

   Any Git command that needs to know a commit can take any of these
   names. For example:

       $ git diff v2.5 HEAD     # compare the current HEAD to v2.5
       $ git branch stable v2.5 # start a new branch named "stable" based
                                # at v2.5
       $ git reset --hard HEAD^ # reset your current branch and working
                                # directory to its state at HEAD^

   Be careful with that last command: in addition to losing any changes in
   the working directory, it will also remove all later commits from this
   branch. If this branch is the only branch containing those commits,
   they will be lost. Also, don't use git reset on a publicly-visible
   branch that other developers pull from, as it will force needless
   merges on other developers to clean up the history. If you need to undo
   changes that you have pushed, use git revert instead.

   The git grep command can search for strings in any version of your
   project, so

       $ git grep "hello" v2.5

   searches for all occurrences of "hello" in v2.5.

   If you leave out the commit name, git grep will search any of the files
   it manages in your current directory. So

       $ git grep "hello"

   is a quick way to search just the files that are tracked by Git.

   Many Git commands also take sets of commits, which can be specified in
   a number of ways. Here are some examples with git log:

       $ git log v2.5..v2.6            # commits between v2.5 and v2.6
       $ git log v2.5..                # commits since v2.5
       $ git log --since="2 weeks ago" # commits from the last 2 weeks
       $ git log v2.5.. Makefile       # commits since v2.5 which modify
                                       # Makefile

   You can also give git log a "range" of commits where the first is not
   necessarily an ancestor of the second; for example, if the tips of the
   branches "stable" and "master" diverged from a common commit some time
   ago, then

       $ git log stable..master

   will list commits made in the master branch but not in the stable
   branch, while

       $ git log master..stable

   will show the list of commits made on the stable branch but not the
   master branch.

   The git log command has a weakness: it must present commits in a list.
   When the history has lines of development that diverged and then merged
   back together, the order in which git log presents those commits is
   meaningless.

   Most projects with multiple contributors (such as the Linux kernel, or
   Git itself) have frequent merges, and gitk does a better job of
   visualizing their history. For example,

       $ gitk --since="2 weeks ago" drivers/

   allows you to browse any commits from the last 2 weeks of commits that
   modified files under the "drivers" directory. (Note: you can adjust
   gitk's fonts by holding down the control key while pressing "-" or
   "+".)

   Finally, most commands that take filenames will optionally allow you to
   precede any filename by a commit, to specify a particular version of
   the file:

       $ git diff v2.5:Makefile HEAD:Makefile.in

   You can also use git show to see any such file:

       $ git show v2.5:Makefile

NEXT STEPS

   This tutorial should be enough to perform basic distributed revision
   control for your projects. However, to fully understand the depth and
   power of Git you need to understand two simple ideas on which it is
   based:

   *   The object database is the rather elegant system used to store the
       history of your project---files, directories, and commits.

   *   The index file is a cache of the state of a directory tree, used to
       create commits, check out working directories, and hold the various
       trees involved in a merge.

   Part two of this tutorial explains the object database, the index file,
   and a few other odds and ends that you'll need to make the most of Git.
   You can find it at gittutorial-2(7).

   If you don't want to continue with that right away, a few other
   digressions that may be interesting at this point are:

   *   git-format-patch(1), git-am(1): These convert series of git commits
       into emailed patches, and vice versa, useful for projects such as
       the Linux kernel which rely heavily on emailed patches.

   *   git-bisect(1): When there is a regression in your project, one way
       to track down the bug is by searching through the history to find
       the exact commit that's to blame. Git bisect can help you perform a
       binary search for that commit. It is smart enough to perform a
       close-to-optimal search even in the case of complex non-linear
       history with lots of merged branches.

   *   gitworkflows(7): Gives an overview of recommended workflows.

   *   giteveryday(7): Everyday Git with 20 Commands Or So.

   *   gitcvs-migration(7): Git for CVS users.

SEE ALSO

   gittutorial-2(7), gitcvs-migration(7), gitcore-tutorial(7),
   gitglossary(7), git-help(1), gitworkflows(7), giteveryday(7), The Git
   User's Manual[1]

GIT

   Part of the git(1) suite.

NOTES

    1. The Git User's Manual
       file:///usr/share/doc/git/html/user-manual.html





Opportunity


Personal Opportunity - Free software gives you access to billions of dollars of software at no cost. Use this software for your business, personal use or to develop a profitable skill. Access to source code provides access to a level of capabilities/information that companies protect though copyrights. Open source is a core component of the Internet and it is available to you. Leverage the billions of dollars in resources and capabilities to build a career, establish a business or change the world. The potential is endless for those who understand the opportunity.

Business Opportunity - Goldman Sachs, IBM and countless large corporations are leveraging open source to reduce costs, develop products and increase their bottom lines. Learn what these companies know about open source and how open source can give you the advantage.





Free Software


Free Software provides computer programs and capabilities at no cost but more importantly, it provides the freedom to run, edit, contribute to, and share the software. The importance of free software is a matter of access, not price. Software at no cost is a benefit but ownership rights to the software and source code is far more significant.


Free Office Software - The Libre Office suite provides top desktop productivity tools for free. This includes, a word processor, spreadsheet, presentation engine, drawing and flowcharting, database and math applications. Libre Office is available for Linux or Windows.





Free Books


The Free Books Library is a collection of thousands of the most popular public domain books in an online readable format. The collection includes great classical literature and more recent works where the U.S. copyright has expired. These books are yours to read and use without restrictions.


Source Code - Want to change a program or know how it works? Open Source provides the source code for its programs so that anyone can use, modify or learn how to write those programs themselves. Visit the GNU source code repositories to download the source.





Education


Study at Harvard, Stanford or MIT - Open edX provides free online courses from Harvard, MIT, Columbia, UC Berkeley and other top Universities. Hundreds of courses for almost all major subjects and course levels. Open edx also offers some paid courses and selected certifications.


Linux Manual Pages - A man or manual page is a form of software documentation found on Linux/Unix operating systems. Topics covered include computer programs (including library and system calls), formal standards and conventions, and even abstract concepts.