system(3posix)


NAME

   system --- issue a command

SYNOPSIS

   #include <stdlib.h>

   int system(const char *command);

DESCRIPTION

   The functionality described on this reference page is aligned with  the
   ISO C  standard.  Any  conflict between the requirements described here
   and the ISO C standard is unintentional. This  volume  of  POSIX.12008
   defers to the ISO C standard.

   If  command  is  a  null pointer, the system() function shall determine
   whether the host environment has a command processor. If command is not
   a  null pointer, the system() function shall pass the string pointed to
   by  command  to  that  command  processor  to   be   executed   in   an
   implementation-defined  manner;  this  might  then  cause  the  program
   calling system() to behave in a non-conforming manner or to terminate.

   The system() function shall behave as if a child process  were  created
   using  fork(),  and  the  child  process  invoked  the sh utility using
   execl() as follows:

       execl(<shell path>, "sh", "-c", command, (char *)0);

   where <shell path> is an unspecified pathname for the sh utility. It is
   unspecified  whether  the handlers registered with pthread_atfork() are
   called as part of the creation of the child process.

   The system() function shall ignore the SIGINT and SIGQUIT signals,  and
   shall  block  the  SIGCHLD  signal,  while  waiting  for the command to
   terminate. If this might cause the application to miss  a  signal  that
   would  have  killed  it, then the application should examine the return
   value from system() and take whatever  action  is  appropriate  to  the
   application if the command terminated due to receipt of a signal.

   The  system()  function  shall not affect the termination status of any
   child of the calling processes other than the process or  processes  it
   itself creates.

   The  system()  function  shall  not  return until the child process has
   terminated.

   The system() function need not be thread-safe.

RETURN VALUE

   If command is  a  null  pointer,  system()  shall  return  non-zero  to
   indicate  that  a  command  processor  is available, or zero if none is
   available.  The system() function shall  always  return  non-zero  when
   command is NULL.

   If command is not a null pointer, system() shall return the termination
   status of the command language interpreter in the format  specified  by
   waitpid().   The  termination  status  shall  be  as defined for the sh
   utility; otherwise, the termination  status  is  unspecified.  If  some
   error  prevents  the  command language interpreter from executing after
   the child process is created, the return value from system()  shall  be
   as  if  the command language interpreter had terminated using exit(127)
   or _exit(127).  If a  child  process  cannot  be  created,  or  if  the
   termination  status  for  the  command  language  interpreter cannot be
   obtained, system() shall return 1 and set errno to indicate the error.

ERRORS

   The system() function may set errno values as described by fork().

   In addition, system() may fail if:

   ECHILD The status of the child process created by system() is no longer
          available.

   The following sections are informative.

EXAMPLES

   None.

APPLICATION USAGE

   If  the  return  value  of system() is not 1, its value can be decoded
   through  the  use  of  the  macros  described  in  <sys/wait.h>.    For
   convenience, these macros are also provided in <stdlib.h>.

   Note  that,  while  system()  must  ignore SIGINT and SIGQUIT and block
   SIGCHLD while waiting for the  child  to  terminate,  the  handling  of
   signals  in  the  executed  command is as specified by fork() and exec.
   For example, if SIGINT is being  caught  or  is  set  to  SIG_DFL  when
   system()  is called, then the child is started with SIGINT handling set
   to SIG_DFL.

   Ignoring SIGINT and SIGQUIT in the parent process prevents coordination
   problems  (two  processes  reading from the same terminal, for example)
   when the executed command ignores or catches one of the signals. It  is
   also  usually  the  correct action when the user has given a command to
   the application to be executed synchronously (as in the '!'  command in
   many  interactive  applications).  In either case, the signal should be
   delivered only to the child process, not  to  the  application  itself.
   There  is one situation where ignoring the signals might have less than
   the desired effect. This is  when  the  application  uses  system()  to
   perform  some  task  invisible  to  the  user.  If  the  user typed the
   interrupt character ("^C", for example) while system() is being used in
   this  way,  one would expect the application to be killed, but only the
   executed command is killed. Applications that use system() in this  way
   should  carefully  check  the return status from system() to see if the
   executed command was successful, and  should  take  appropriate  action
   when the command fails.

   Blocking  SIGCHLD while waiting for the child to terminate prevents the
   application  from  catching  the  signal  and  obtaining  status   from
   system()'s child process before system() can get the status itself.

   The context in which the utility is ultimately executed may differ from
   that in which system() was called. For example, file  descriptors  that
   have  the FD_CLOEXEC flag set are closed, and the process ID and parent
   process ID are different. Also, if the  executed  utility  changes  its
   environment  variables or its current working directory, that change is
   not reflected in the caller's context.

   There is no defined way for an application to find  the  specific  path
   for  the shell. However, confstr() can provide a value for PATH that is
   guaranteed to find the sh utility.

   Using the system() function in more than one thread  in  a  process  or
   when the SIGCHLD signal is being manipulated by more than one thread in
   a process may produce unexpected results.

RATIONALE

   The system() function should not be used by programs that have set user
   (or  group)  ID  privileges.  The  fork()  and exec family of functions
   (except execlp() and execvp()), should be used instead.  This  prevents
   any  unforeseen  manipulation of the environment of the user that could
   cause execution of commands not anticipated by the calling program.

   There are three levels of specification for the system() function.  The
   ISO C  standard  gives  the  most  basic. It requires that the function
   exists, and defines a way for an application to query whether a command
   language interpreter exists. It says nothing about the command language
   or the environment in which the command is interpreted.

   POSIX.12008 places additional restrictions on system().   It  requires
   that  if  there is a command language interpreter, the environment must
   be as specified by fork() and exec.  This ensures,  for  example,  that
   close-on-exec  works,  that  file locks are not inherited, and that the
   process ID is different.  It  also  specifies  the  return  value  from
   system()  when the command line can be run, thus giving the application
   some information about the command's completion status.

   Finally, POSIX.12008 requires the command to be interpreted as in  the
   shell  command  language  defined  in the Shell and Utilities volume of
   POSIX.12008.

   Note that, system(NULL) is required to return non-zero, indicating that
   there  is  a  command language interpreter. At first glance, this would
   seem to conflict with the ISO C standard which allows  system(NULL)  to
   return  zero.  There  is  no  conflict,  however.  A system must have a
   command language interpreter, and is non-conforming if none is present.
   It  is therefore permissible for the system() function on such a system
   to implement the behavior specified by the ISO C standard as long as it
   is  understood that the implementation does not conform to POSIX.12008
   if system(NULL) returns zero.

   It was explicitly decided that when command is  NULL,  system()  should
   not  be  required  to  check  to  make  sure  that the command language
   interpreter actually exists with  the  correct  mode,  that  there  are
   enough processes to execute it, and so on. The call system(NULL) could,
   theoretically, check for such  problems  as  too  many  existing  child
   processes,  and  return  zero.  However,  it  would be inappropriate to
   return zero due to such a (presumably)  transient  condition.  If  some
   condition  exists that is not under the control of this application and
   that would cause any system()  call  to  fail,  that  system  has  been
   rendered non-conforming.

   Early drafts required, or allowed, system() to return with errno set to
   [EINTR] if it was interrupted with a  signal.  This  error  return  was
   removed, and a requirement that system() not return until the child has
   terminated was added. This means that if a waitpid() call  in  system()
   exits  with  errno set to [EINTR], system() must reissue the waitpid().
   This change was made for two reasons:

    1. There is no way for an application to clean up if system()  returns
       [EINTR],   short  of  calling  wait(),  and  that  could  have  the
       undesirable effect of returning the status of children  other  than
       the one started by system().

    2. While it might require a change in some historical implementations,
       those implementations already have to be changed because  they  use
       wait() instead of waitpid().

   Note  that  if  the  application  is  catching SIGCHLD signals, it will
   receive such a signal before a successful system() call returns.

   To conform to  POSIX.12008,  system()  must  use  waitpid(),  or  some
   similar function, instead of wait().

   The following code sample illustrates how system() might be implemented
   on an implementation conforming to POSIX.12008.

       #include <signal.h>
       int system(const char *cmd)
       {
           int stat;
           pid_t pid;
           struct sigaction sa, savintr, savequit;
           sigset_t saveblock;
           if (cmd == NULL)
               return(1);
           sa.sa_handler = SIG_IGN;
           sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
           sa.sa_flags = 0;
           sigemptyset(&savintr.sa_mask);
           sigemptyset(&savequit.sa_mask);
           sigaction(SIGINT, &sa, &savintr);
           sigaction(SIGQUIT, &sa, &savequit);
           sigaddset(&sa.sa_mask, SIGCHLD);
           sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &sa.sa_mask, &saveblock);
           if ((pid = fork()) == 0) {
               sigaction(SIGINT, &savintr, (struct sigaction *)0);
               sigaction(SIGQUIT, &savequit, (struct sigaction *)0);
               sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &saveblock, (sigset_t *)0);
               execl("/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", cmd, (char *)0);
               _exit(127);
           }
           if (pid == -1) {
               stat = -1; /* errno comes from fork() */
           } else {
               while (waitpid(pid, &stat, 0) == -1) {
                   if (errno != EINTR){
                       stat = -1;
                       break;
                   }
               }
           }
           sigaction(SIGINT, &savintr, (struct sigaction *)0);
           sigaction(SIGQUIT, &savequit, (struct sigaction *)0);
           sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &saveblock, (sigset_t *)0);
           return(stat);
       }

   Note that, while a particular implementation of system() (such  as  the
   one  above)  can assume a particular path for the shell, such a path is
   not necessarily valid on another  system.  The  above  example  is  not
   portable, and is not intended to be.

   One reviewer suggested that an implementation of system() might want to
   use an environment variable such as SHELL to  determine  which  command
   interpreter  to  use. The supposed implementation would use the default
   command interpreter if the one specified by  the  environment  variable
   was  not  available. This would allow a user, when using an application
   that prompts for command lines  to  be  processed  using  system(),  to
   specify  a  different  command  interpreter.  Such an implementation is
   discouraged. If the alternate command interpreter did  not  follow  the
   command  line  syntax  specified  in  the Shell and Utilities volume of
   POSIX.12008, then changing SHELL would render system() non-conforming.
   This  would  affect  applications  that expected the specified behavior
   from system(), and since the Shell and Utilities volume of POSIX.12008
   does not mention that SHELL affects system(), the application would not
   know that it needed to unset SHELL.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

   None.

SEE ALSO

   exec, pipe(), pthread_atfork(), wait()

   The Base Definitions volume of  POSIX.12008,  <limits.h>,  <signal.h>,
   <stdlib.h>, <sys_wait.h>

   The Shell and Utilities volume of POSIX.12008, sh

COPYRIGHT

   Portions  of  this text are reprinted and reproduced in electronic form
   from IEEE Std 1003.1, 2013 Edition, Standard for Information Technology
   --  Portable  Operating  System  Interface (POSIX), The Open Group Base
   Specifications  Issue  7,  Copyright  (C)  2013  by  the  Institute  of
   Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc and The Open Group.  (This is
   POSIX.1-2008 with the 2013 Technical Corrigendum  1  applied.)  In  the
   event of any discrepancy between this version and the original IEEE and
   The Open Group Standard, the original IEEE and The Open Group  Standard
   is  the  referee document. The original Standard can be obtained online
   at http://www.unix.org/online.html .

   Any typographical or formatting errors that appear  in  this  page  are
   most likely to have been introduced during the conversion of the source
   files   to   man   page   format.   To   report   such   errors,    see
   https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html .





Opportunity


Personal Opportunity - Free software gives you access to billions of dollars of software at no cost. Use this software for your business, personal use or to develop a profitable skill. Access to source code provides access to a level of capabilities/information that companies protect though copyrights. Open source is a core component of the Internet and it is available to you. Leverage the billions of dollars in resources and capabilities to build a career, establish a business or change the world. The potential is endless for those who understand the opportunity.

Business Opportunity - Goldman Sachs, IBM and countless large corporations are leveraging open source to reduce costs, develop products and increase their bottom lines. Learn what these companies know about open source and how open source can give you the advantage.





Free Software


Free Software provides computer programs and capabilities at no cost but more importantly, it provides the freedom to run, edit, contribute to, and share the software. The importance of free software is a matter of access, not price. Software at no cost is a benefit but ownership rights to the software and source code is far more significant.


Free Office Software - The Libre Office suite provides top desktop productivity tools for free. This includes, a word processor, spreadsheet, presentation engine, drawing and flowcharting, database and math applications. Libre Office is available for Linux or Windows.





Free Books


The Free Books Library is a collection of thousands of the most popular public domain books in an online readable format. The collection includes great classical literature and more recent works where the U.S. copyright has expired. These books are yours to read and use without restrictions.


Source Code - Want to change a program or know how it works? Open Source provides the source code for its programs so that anyone can use, modify or learn how to write those programs themselves. Visit the GNU source code repositories to download the source.





Education


Study at Harvard, Stanford or MIT - Open edX provides free online courses from Harvard, MIT, Columbia, UC Berkeley and other top Universities. Hundreds of courses for almost all major subjects and course levels. Open edx also offers some paid courses and selected certifications.


Linux Manual Pages - A man or manual page is a form of software documentation found on Linux/Unix operating systems. Topics covered include computer programs (including library and system calls), formal standards and conventions, and even abstract concepts.